Thursday, July 13, 2006

"Gentlemen, trials are too important to be left up to juries."

In order to catch up on some important movie watching Shauna and I are heading out to Penticton for the next 10 days or so. We’ll pitch our tent, cook some hot dogs and then set up the portable DVD player and watch movies the whole time.

I wonder if Shauna knows that that’s what we’ll be doing? Oh well. I’m sure we’ll find some time for the beach and maybe a round or two of golf. And of course we’ll have to visit the many fruit stands as well as take a tour of the local micro-brewery. I think we will be swinging by the used bookstore also and possibly having a dinner a couple times at a few of the nice restaurants in town. And we’ll likely just do some sitting around, relaxing, sleeping in. You know, vacating.

Ok, so maybe I won’t have as much time for movies as I think. Regardless, I won’t be around to update the blog so here’s a brief rundown of the films I’ve been watching lately. Enjoy!

Although Apocalypse Now has been hailed as a war-classic for many years, I had never actually seen it until about a month ago. While I’m glad I got a chance to finally watch it, I’m not sure it has stood the test of time as well as some other classics. It’s obvious that the film is trying to convey the horror of war and uses Vietnam as its canvas, but the pacing feels as stoned as most of the characters. The only real shining moments are those scenes that feature Robert Duvall and the famous helicopter attack. The Redux version is particularly lengthy and drawn-out and I found myself simply waiting for the film to be over so I could finally say I had seen it. Although credited as a ‘must-see-before-you-die’ movie I really don’t think you’re missing too much if you skip this one.

Despite the fact that Tom Cruise has lost his mind recently I still think he is a good actor. At the very least he has been in some very good films. A Few Good Men is certainly among the best. His courtroom performance with Jack Nicholson is one of the most memorable in film history. Who hasn’t, at one time or another, raised their fist and firmly stated “You can’t handle the truth!”? Director Rob Reiner has an impressive resume, including The Princess Bride and Stand By Me, and A Few Good Men is just another fine example of his ability to draw the audience in and tell a great story. Definitely a must-see.

Every year Shauna and I add the Best Picture nominee films to our list of movies to see. Sometimes it takes a while to get around to actually seeing them but we finally caught Good Night, And Good Luck on DVD. This is a really interesting look at some events that took place during some big communist hunt in the States a while ago. Ok, I could probably have given a much better description of the film but I can’t really remember all the details. The performances were really good and I enjoyed the film; I just can’t tell you what it’s exactly about. But it’s good. No, really.

Another Academy Award nominee, Munich is a gripping look at a country’s retaliation against a group of terrorists who murdered the 1972 Israeli Olympic team. Eric Bana gives an incredible performance as one of the assassins secretly hired by his government to carry out the executions. The film is not only entertaining purely from an action/suspense point of view, but is also an incredibly intense look at justice and revenge. There seem to be a lot of Academy Award nominees that are best on true events and Munich does a superb job of retelling those events and the terrible consequences they had on everyone involved.

I’m a big fan of John Cusack’s films. I really like his acting style and the characters he plays are both entertaining and intriguing. Runaway Jury is no exception. Based on the John Grisham novel, Runaway Jury is about a couple who con their way onto the jury of a Federal gun case and attempt to offer the verdict, for sale, to either the prosecution or defense. Gene Hackman and Dustin Hoffman give incredible performances and Cusack keeps the audience guessing his true motives throughout the film. I really enjoyed this flick and would highly recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good court room suspense/drama.

Believe it or not, Shauna actually wanted to watch this one. There are only a few Adam Sandler films that we both like and for some strange reason Happy Gilmore is one of them. It’s just really funny. Adam does what he does best and takes a simple concept, in this case an ex-hockey player who has an incredibly long golf drive, and makes it interesting and hilarious. Filled a number of those wonderful, quotable lines (“That’s your home, ball. Why didn’t you go home? Are you too good for your home?!”) Happy Gilmore is a ton of fun.

My history-teacher friend, Dave, recommended that we watch Battle of Britain not too long ago. I had never seen this film classic and I was looking forward to learning more about this brief period during World War II when England faced desperate odds while defending their country against countless German air raids and bombings. The film boasts a huge roster of famous actors and it was fun to see them in their prime. While the special effects are a little dated the film itself has stood the test of time well. The pacing seems to accurately reflect the actual battle and gives the viewer an in-depth look at how battle unfolded. If you have any interest in WWII, I highly recommend it.

The Red Violin is definitely one of Shauna’s favourite films and it’s not hard to see why. Filled with beautiful music and encompassing an epic span of time The Red Violin follows the life of a magnificent violin and its numerous owners. This is a relatively unknown film that was actually produced in Canada and should be seen by anyone who has any love of music. My only complaint is that the film has been released in three separate DVD versions and two of them are horrible. I originally owned the first horrible one, sold it and replaced it with what I thought was the good version. Nope, horrible version number two is now in my collection. A good chunk of the film is in other languages and so the film has numerous subtitles. But for some reason this version of the DVD leaves the subtitles out, so the only way to understand the film is to turn on the closed captioning which gives you subtitles for everything; foreign language scenes, English language scenes, even sound effects and music cues. I can’t tell you how annoying it is. If you ever see the Lion’s Gate or Atlantis releases of The Red Violin, avoid them like the plague. If you ever see the original Universal release immediately buy two copies; one for you and one for me. I’ll pay you back. No, really.

When I get back from my wonderful vacation I’ll update you on some of the other films I’ve been watching. In the mean time don’t forget to have a look at the movie actor/character quiz that was posted last week.

I wonder if Penticton has good prices on DVDs…

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

"What was I supposed to do? Call him for cheating better than me?"

My DVD collection contains many blockbuster films from recent years. Filled with incredible special effects and thunderous DTS surround sound, these films are fun to watch again and again. However, there are a few classic movies in my collection that are actually older than I am, and Shauna and I were able to add a few more recently.

Using a gift certificate I got from a very good friend I was able to finally pick up the Special Edition DVD of ‘The Great Escape’ (1963). It’s a fairly pricey DVD, which kept me from adding it to the collection earlier, so many thanks to JR! I also picked up two classic Paul Newman / Robert Redford films, ‘Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid’ (1969) and ‘The Sting’ (1973). All three DVD editions come with bonus discs filled with special features and I can’t wait to learn more about these memorable films.

Over this past weekend Shauna and I got together with another great friend, Vince, to watch The Sting. Shauna has seen it many times and was actually the one who got me to see it for the first time while we were dating. Vince claimed he had seen it before but soon realized that he was thinking of another movie. It was the perfect audience; a long-time fan who has loved the film from childhood, an eager movie addict who had only seen it once, and an interested friend who got to experience the original ‘big con’ for the first time.

Robert Redford plays Johnny Hooker, a small time con artist in the 1930s who inadvertently scams $10,000 from a man working for infamous criminal banker Doyle Lonnegan (Robert Shaw, ‘Jaws’). Lonnegan, looking to make an example of the petty thieves, has Hooker’s partner murdered. Seeking revenge, Hooker teams up with Henry Gondorff (Paul Newman) to target Lonnegan as the mark in “the big con”. With Lonnegan’s goons still hunting for Hooker, an FBI investigation into Gondorff’s activities and a police detective out to profit from it all, Hooker and Gondorff will have to play every angle to make sure the sting goes off without a hitch.

I think the main draw to seeing this film has to do with Redford and Newman. If you’ve ever seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, you know what I’m talking about. Of course, if you’ve seen The Sting then you would know what I would be talking about if I was talking about Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. The point is that Redford and Newman are an impressive duo and their chemistry on-screen is unparalleled. You can tell that these actors not only enjoy working together but that they are likely very good friends in real life. Shauna was telling me that Paul Newman is old enough that he is probably only going to do one more movie and he has indicated that he would like to do it with Robert Redford. Watching them play off each other in The Sting is impressive and incredibly entertaining. They have a way of drawing you into their scheme and making you feel like you’re a part of it all.

Each actor is incredibly talented in his own right. Paul Newman gives one of the best performances of his career in the poker scene on the train. This scene set the bar high for films like Rounders, Ocean’s 11 and Maverick. That’s impressive for a film that’s now over 30 years old. And it’s that staying power that proves how great The Sting really is. The story is one that would do well in today’s theatres, as is the acting, script and direction. It’s not surprising that The Sting garnered 10 Academy Award nominations in 1973 and went on to win 7 of them, including Best Picture. I was surprised at how modern the film felt, despite its age.

The Special Edition DVD of The Sting is a wonderful treatment of this classic film. The first of two discs contains the feature film in a beautiful 1.85:1 Anamorphic transfer. The sets and costumes might look dated (the film is set in the 1930s) but the picture quality is anything but. Colors are sharp and crisp, detail is incredible and there are no image artefacts or scratches to be seen. Universal has done a fantastic job of cleaning up The Sting and they even include a DTS 5.1 sound track! The film doesn’t really make much use of all that 5.1 can offer, but it certainly goes a long way toward drawing you into the movie. Voices are clear and the music is perfectly balanced with the action on-screen. Again, for a movie that is over 30 years old this DVD is a truly impressive presentation.

A second disc contains a number of special features, which I haven’t had a chance to look at yet. However, I am considering a full review of this DVD, along with 2 others, as part of my application for a DVD-review job with digitallyobsessed.com. So stay tuned for more details on The Sting as well as information regarding my rise to fame as a world renowned DVD critic.

The Sting is an incredible film. Paul Newman and Robert Redford are perfect together and their performances are very entertaining. The script is fantastic and keeps the story moving at a pace that will have you gripped from start to finish. In the end The Sting is just a ton of fun. This is the film that truly inspired the ‘big con’ films like Ocean’s 11, The Italian Job, The Color of Money and Heist. And, arguably, none of them have done it as well as The Sting did. You owe it to yourself to see this film.

The Sting gets 9 winks and a nod (out of 10).

Find a sweet mark, make sure everything’s jake and click here for ‘The Sting’ trivia.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

What's in a name?

Due to the enormous success of the movie quote quiz I posted a couple of weeks ago I’ve decided to create another quiz for my multitude of adoring fans. I’m sure all four of you will enjoy it.

This time you need to identify the actor. I’ve provided 10 groups of character names. Each group contains 4 characters that were all played by the same actor in different movies. It’s up to you to figure out which actor played all 4 roles in each group, resulting in 10 actor names.

For bonus points, identify the movie each character is associated with.

Obviously the idea of the quiz is to see how good your movie-character knowledge is; not how good your internet research skills are. So avoid using the internet, or any other source, to identify the actor names and movies. After all, if you all used the internet to do this quiz, you would all get 100% and where’s the fun in that? So raise your right hand and repeat after me: ‘I will not cheat. I am not a cheater. Cheaters never prosper. Cheaters get scratches all over their DVD collections and there is never enough butter on their popcorn.’

Email your answers to this email address and I’ll pick a winner by July 13th, 2006. Good luck!

Group 1
Father Brian Finn
Derek Vinyard
King Baldwin
Aaron Stampler

Group 2
Rusty Ryan
John Smith
Jeffrey Goines
Detective David Mills

Group 3
Parcher
Major Konig
Christof
Carl Fogarty

Group 4
Professor G.H. Dorr
Carl Hanratty
Jimmy Dugan
Andrew Beckett

Group 5
Bobby Darin
Lester Burnham
Prot
Hopper

Group 6
The Mariner
Lt. John Dunbar
Ray Kinsella
Crash Davis

Group 7
Col. William A. McNamara
Korben Dallas
Harry S. Stamper
Dr. Malcolm Crowe

Group 8
Nathan Algren
Lt. Daniel Kaffee
Chief John Anderton
Cole Trickle

Group 9
Nicholas Easter
Martin Q. Blank
U.S. Marshal Vince Larkin
Denny Lachance

Group 10
Ed Bloom
Spec. John Grimes
Renton
Lincoln Six Echo

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Another nail in the coffin

Last week, Shauna and I went to see X-Men 3 in the theatres.

Ok, calm down and let me explain. First of all the main intent of the outing was to meet some friends of hers from work and just have a good time. Second of all, the film does have Hugh Jackman in it, so it would have been pointless to resist. And third, since we hadn’t been to the movies since Star Wars Episode III it seemed like a good opportunity to finally compare the home theatre experience with the big screen.

Having said that I think I am officially done with the theatres. I just can’t justify the cost.

In my mind, here are the cons of going to the theatre, as compared to just watching a DVD:

It costs a LOT

I guess when a movie costs 8 gazillion dollars to make the studios need to make their money back somehow. Thus the ticket price of $10.75. I guess that’s not too bad for 2 hours of entertainment. But $4.86 for a medium iced tea? We even had a coupon for a free popcorn and our total for the evening came in over $35.00! I can buy the DVD cheaper than that and watch it whenever I want, as often as I want, with whoever I want.

Commercials

I feel like I’ve been taken complete advantage of when I’m forced to sit through 5 minutes or so of advertising after I’ve already paid a fair chunk of change to see the movie. And I’m not talking about previews for other films but rather the actual commercials we’re used to seeing on TV at home. Again, I can only assume that the exorbitant costs associated with making a blockbuster film force the studios to sell advertising time at the beginning of those films. But do they really think I can afford to buy a new car after spending $17 on a chocolate bar?

Picture Quality

This was a big one for me (no pun intended). After getting our big screen TV I was told by several people that the picture quality in the theatre is still better. I could believe this since film is about as high quality as you can get, where DVD is still a digital image and is limited by the resolution of the disc itself. I won’t go into all the technical details but I was expecting a high definition picture in the theatre. Well apparently I’ve been spoiled. Not only was the picture not crystal clear but there were scratches and lines and specks of dust throughout. Not to mention those pesky ‘cigarette burns’ that appear during every reel change (watch Fight Club for an explanation). I probably wouldn’t notice it as much if I wasn’t looking for all the defects but the fact remains that if I go searching for defects on a DVD at home I wouldn’t find a tenth as many as I did in the theatre.

Other People

We planned our trip pretty well and managed to avoid the crowds. The film had already been out for several weeks and it was a Monday night. So the theatre itself was virtually empty. And yet we still had people sitting directly in front of us, behind us and on one side. The guy on my immediate left must have had a nervous condition because he felt it necessary to rapidly tap his fingers on his knee throughout the entire movie. Tappity-tappity-tappity-tap… I would have thrown my drink at him if I didn't have to take out a loan to afford another one.

I’ll admit that I was fairly certain that my trip to the theatre wasn’t going to convince me that that DVDs aren’t the way to go. I had already decided that a while back. But I certainly didn’t plan on an experience that made me hate the theatres even more! Ultimately it’s not really the theatre’s fault; I used to love going to the movies and it didn’t seem to bother me much at all back then. But then I got a home theatre set up and I’ve seen the light. The movie theatre just can’t compare to the home theatre experience. They can’t compare to the cost, the comfort or the convenience. And it would appear that they can no longer compare to the quality either.

As far as I can tell, there are really only two good reasons for going to the theatre:

1) You get to see the movie earlier than if you wait for it on DVD. Though I guess that’s only a good reason if time is that important to you. Personally, I have no problem waiting a mere 5 or 6 months. When I finally do see the movie, it will look better and I’ll enjoy it more in the comfort of my own home. And I won’t have to sell my kidneys to afford it.

2) It’s a chance to get out of the house and have a date. It’s hard to argue with this one. It definitely is nice to get out once in a while, but I think I can come up with some alternatives to the movie theatre that are more reasonable when it comes to money and time.

Anyway, there’s my rant about the theatres. If you’ve got some opinions or thoughts, please feel free to add your comments. I’d love to hear what you have to say, especially if you’ve got some arguments for the theatre. Maybe I’m missing the big picture (pun intended).

Oh, and the movie itself was pretty good. Something about mutants I think.